To me, anyone can become writers, as long as they have a pen, a paper, and a passion for writing. Writers don’t have to take certain English classes, or be above a certain age to be qualified and called writers. They can be children, teenagers, adults, scientists, socialists, politicians who approach to writing with various purposes and create diverse genres of writings.
During the winter break, I went to my friend’s uncle’s house; my friend had a cousin who was a ten-year-old boy and wrote a novel dedicated to his parents. I was astonished at what he wrote and how he wrote the novel. To me, it was a superior novel written by a ten-year-old boy. The grammar, vocabulary and sentence structures were all correct and sophisticated, and the content of the novel was not merely a child story. The ten-year-old boy talked about his life and how to have a successful life. He concluded the story that everyone should bear in mind two things to achieve success in the fastest way. First, get an education, because it will offer you more options and paths to success in life. Second, do not procrastinate, as success will not come to people who, for instance, want to get an A on a paper, but wait until the night before the due date to start writing the paper.
His novel, though unpublished, has a strange attraction that amazed me and drew me in. I would say that I, a college student, never thought about simple yet memorable things that he, a ten-year-old boy, said in his novel. It struck me that people are inherent writers provided that they want to write, and they are able to draw certain people in their writings with their experience and meanings embedded in the writings. Even for those who don’t write well, as long as they want to write, they can learn to improve their writing day by day with their passion and persistence. Sometimes, I even enjoy reading a clumsy writing with incorrect sentence structures and inappropriate word choices for I still learn something from that writing. My friend who is a business major has a poor writing skill and she always sends her papers to me to look over before submitting them. I learn from each inept expression in her paper what words can be better used for this expression, why this or that term sounds awkward and think whether I have ever used the same expression before. By being a reader, I come to know what readers expect in a writing and what kind of expression is often awkward or bad that sometimes I don’t realize when I am in the flow of writing.
For creative writers, I think they play an important role in bringing the world to all kinds of people through various genres of literature. Children read Dr. Seuss’ books, teenagers read Meg Cabot’s novels, and adults read work of Stephen King, Dan Brown or Mark Twain in order to learn about the world in their own way which fits their age and thinking. Yet, some creations have no age gap and can be read and enjoyed by anyone, like Harry Potter which children, teenagers, and adults all understand and prefer. It is the way people interpret the story that makes a difference. Children may like Harry Potter simply because he is brave and smart. Teenagers are fond of Harry Potter for broader reasons such as he is a good friend and altruistic person who places other people above himself. Adults, yet, have more profound reasons for reading Harry Potter. They admire the way J. K. Rowling developed the plot and characters in the novel; they feel as if they were growing up each day with Harry Potter throughout seven books, and the events in the story are connected and supplement each other well. Adults would also like the use of language and ending that Rowling had, for the language is simple, comprehensible but captivating, and the ending is inevitable and offers a closure to the story. The beauty of a writing, thus, lies in readers’ different interpretations and reactions that sometimes, are even beyond the author’s intentional meanings. A beautiful writing to me, in general, is something that evokes people’s feelings, makes them think, learn, wonder, change or put questions. It leads people to do something, rather than just close a book and think, “I’m done reading this.”
At the age of 19, I prefer fiction novels containing profound meanings that challenge my thinking, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t read Roald Dahl’s work or Meg Cabot’s the princess’ diaries series. With a grown up mind, I enjoyed Willie Wonka and the chocolate factory for its humor and moral, and I read the princess’ diaries because I want to remember my past childhood when I used to wish for a “charming prince” like Michael in the story, struggled with my friendships and wondered how to be a popular girl at school. I think writers like Roald Dahl and Meg Cabot who created work in which they had to place themselves in a different age and era owned a great courage and a timeless imagination. Some people at my age would say Roald Dahl’s work is so childlike, or Meg Cabot’s novels are so superficial. I would nod my head and say yes, because Roald Dahl wrote for children so if his work is childlike, it is a successful work. Meg Cabot’s fiction characters are superficial because we used to be superficial like that when we were 12 to 15, paying attention to how popular we were at school and whether this boy, that boy liked us or not. I embrace the beauty of literature by engulfing myself with various genres and types of writing in order to understand the world around me in different positions, and be able to see and view things differently in each position.
I think one of the important goals of writers is to transmit emotions to readers through writings, make readers feel more than simply know. Given a novel and a movie that is based on the novel, I would prefer to read the novel, because I am able to feel characters, understand what characters in the novel think and how they are like, which sometimes are unclearly portrayed in movies. I often found myself drawn to a novel because of the inner thoughts, wonders and feelings of characters, rather than any specific events in the story. However, for movies, I look for actions and events to guess what characters think and feel, how certain characters are like. For instance, if a novel describing in details inner feelings and confession of a man when looking at his wife sleeping, how can movies portray that scene? We cannot thoroughly tell what he really thinks by looking at his facial expression, and hearing him saying out loud his thinking and confession is unnatural. Many things are better to be read rather than seen or heard visually. When I read my favorite novel Scarlet Heart, the letter of the female protagonist shed me to tears. However, when I watched the movie and heard the character reading the letter out loud, the letter did not leave me with any feelings. I felt that the letter was not that touching and significant like it was in the novel. Hence, another beauty of writing and literature in general is that people are able to approach to art in another form that in many cases, it turns out to be the best “stage” for an idea to be displayed that no other forms can replace.
I love writing fiction stories and think that two most difficult things in creating a good story are what communication theorists call the coherence and fidelity of events in the story. Coherence of a story is how connected and consistent events and characters in that story are. Fidelity is how true and credible events and characters are to readers based on their experience and points of view. The novel Scarlet Heart novel that I like has the ending that is very controversial. Because the female protagonist and the male protagonist go through a lot of challenges when they live together, the female protagonist decides to break up with her lover although she knows that she is going to die soon. She thinks that it is better for them to be separated during the last days she lives so that they don’t have to go through any more challenges, and that she is able to think about the man she loves in peace. I personally think that the ending is very logical and inevitable. This is because I think that love does not mean that two people have to live together and be side by side with each other. As long as two people keep each other’s images and good memories in their mind and heart, their love still exists no matter where they are. However, many people including my best friend think that there can also be another logical and inevitable ending in which the female protagonist keeps living with her lover because she is aware that she is going to die soon. My best friend would prefer that ending because it rings true with her personalities and how she views the world. She thinks that love only exists and is permanent when two people can be together. Once two characters in a story are separated, it is a sad ending no matter what.
By this, I think that some stories have one and only inevitable ending, but some have more than one inevitable ending and writers subjectively choose a path that they think will leave the deepest impact on readers, or will turn the story into a moral and meaningful one. It is possible but difficult to write a story that pleases all types of readers and rings true to everyone’s experience. However, writers try to place themselves in readers’ position to understand what is called “common sense”, what most readers would expect in the ending, in events of a story. I call myself a creative writer as I started writing fiction stories and had some published since I was in the eleventh grade. When my stories were published either online or on magazines, readers discussed about my stories and gave mixed opinions. I was always open to criticism by saying thank-you to readers for their comments and suggestions, and defensive only when it is reasonable to defend my writing. For example, a few readers once told me that one of my stories sounded similar to something that they read. I defended my writing by saying that I came up with the plot myself and sometimes, I could not avoid certain cliche in literature that made them thought that the story was not entirely unique. Overall, I think that writers should limit their defensiveness to the lowest level because they should be listening to learn from other people more than saying and going on their own ways.
This is because the beauty of writing is the fact that it is a mutual process, that we not only write for ourselves, to express our feelings, beliefs and transmit our imagination into papers, but we also write for other people. We write to have people read and listen to our confession, to sympathize with depressing issues that we portray in stories, and to reinforce their beliefs and points of view about the world. The beauty of writing is that it is such another tool of communication that conveys and connects people.